Germany’s recent labour agreement with Kenya, welcoming 250,000 skilled and semi-skilled Kenyan workers, has sparked heated debate on social media. While the deal, initiated by Kenya’s president, aims to address Germany’s labour shortages, some German nationals expressed concerns online. A Twitter user, EvaVlaar, voiced fears of replacement by legal immigrants, fueling a conversation on whether this was valid criticism or racially charged. The term “The Great Replacement” resurfaced, with critics seeing immigration as a cultural and economic threat. Supporters of the deal argue for the benefits of a more inclusive workforce, but the discussions have illuminated deep divisions in public sentiment over immigration policies.

Is It Racism or Genuine Concern?

The Twitter thread was flooded with exchanges, from those promoting the deal to others questioning the influx of foreign workers. Critics argue that Germany’s immigration policies compromise its cultural identity and social fabric. On the other hand, proponents dismiss these concerns as baseless and tied to racial anxieties. The rise of rhetoric like “The Great Replacement” underscores the tension between those who feel threatened by immigration and those advocating for an open, tolerant society. The question remains whether this backlash is motivated by genuine concern over job security or deep-rooted fears of a changing demographic landscape.